Menu  |
|
|
|
| Telefoni |
Il nostro centralino:
+39 0924 507600 pbx
Il nostro fax:
+39 0924 507607
|
|
|
 |
Libro d'Onore |
 |
|
| Nota n°52378 |
da siglulstsr
il 10/09/2013 @ 17:53 | | Alaskan anonymice. Joe McGinniss got knocked by reviewers??for relying so heavily on anonymous sources for his new book, The Rogue: Searching for the Real Sarah Palin. Today he strikes back at his critics in the opinion pages of , citing Bob Woodward, New York Times Executive Editor Jill Abramson, and Huffington Post media reporter Michael Calderone on why journalists must get anonymice to squeak about the powerful if they’re going to get the story.In mounting his defense, McGinniss lunges for the “speaking truth to power” cliché and hugs it as if he’s drowning and it’s the only safety buoy bobbing in sight. In the case of McGinniss’s coverage of Palin, who resigned from the office of governor in July 2009, the more appropriate catch phrase would be “speaking truth to those out of power.” Since 2009, Palin has held little power outside of her TV appearances, her reality TV show, her two best-selling books, her sporadic bus tours, and a threat to run for president. By such a wobbly yardstick, even Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich can almost be considered “powerful.”McGinniss brags in the op-ed that he interviewed about 200 people in Alaska and quoted more than 60 in the book. As I read The Rogue, I kept track of the number of anonymous sources that he cited and came up with more than 50. It seems to me that a book that isn’t about national security or whose information isn’t cocooned beneath a corporate veil, such as The Rogue, should have had a better ratio than 60 named sources to 50 unnamed ones. McGinniss builds the case in his book and his op-ed that Sarah and Todd Palin deal vindictively with people who cross them, although to the best of my knowledge none of their victims have been fished out of Cook Inlet.It doesn’t bother me that McGinniss relied heavily on anonymous sources for reporting his book but it does bug me that he gave them such voice and prominence in the telling of his story. Just because an anonymous source says something doesn’t make it true; just ask Judith Miller. In many cases, anonymous sources have less of an incentive to tell the truth than someone speaking on the record because they know nobody is going to find them out. Also, on-the-record quotations are easier to verify than anonymous ones. McGinniss knows this. Must I go on?As for McGinniss’s USA Today kicker?”And let’s remember, without Deep Throat,???, there wouldn’t have been any Watergate hearings, and Richard Nixon would never have resigned”?this is absolutely wrong. Deep Throat wasn’t the essential source that broke the Watergate story,Coach ???????, as W. Joseph Campbell (and others) have reported. McGinniss could pick up a copy of Campbell’s 2010 book, Getting It Wrong: Ten of the Greatest Misreported Stories in American Journalism or click through to this piece on . As Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein write in , Woodward’s discussions with Deep Throat were “only to confirm information that had been obtained elsewhere, and to add some perspective.?Netflix switcheroo. Having named his DVD rental service “Netflix” instead of “PostalFlix,PENTAX,” company founder Reed Hastings consciously telegraphed the electronic future of his company. So, having contemplated this transition from the beginning, how could he so completely bollix the decision to halve the company into two entities, Qwikster for DVDs and Netflix for streaming,MARC BY MARC JACOBS, and then announce that he’s stitching the twins back together and calling his one big baby Netflix again?I can’t think of any parallel in business history that compares to the Netflix debacle. Hastings’s mistake was to bundle a new service?video streaming?into the Netflix classic product in and charge no additional price as long as subscribers didn’t exceed defined viewing thresholds (six hours for $5.99 a month subscribers and 18 hours for $17.99 a month subscribers). Netflix is a flat-rate viewing service,Coach ??????, Hastings actively signaled to his customers.Had Hastings charged a nominal extra sum for streaming from the beginning, indicating to customers he was launching a second, new product that he was discounting to his DVD customers, few would have griped. That would have left him free to increase the streaming fee as the size and quality of his streaming library grew and as he expanded the number of hours of streaming per customer. I don’t recall any cable TV subscribers threatening to bomb Comcast offices when pay-per-view was introduced as a separate, paid product decades ago.People don’t really protest for long if you start charging for something that was once considered free, just as long as you haven’t mistakenly bundled it with a paid product. Take, for example, the low resistance to the New York Times‘s recent imposition of a pay wall for its Web s |
| Nota n°52377 |
da qiyhqngdeu
il 10/09/2013 @ 17:53
 http://www.japanbrandoutleter.com | | ????????????????????????????????????????????????????,http://www.japanbrandteamer.com/RUNNING-4696/???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????,???? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????h??,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????? ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????,??? ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????br /> ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,???? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????,????????? ?????????(??)?(?)?(??)??(??)?(?)?(??)?????????????????????????????,KOBE LEBRON ????????????,??????? ??? ?????????????:
????????????????????
????????????????????
fb4a2d620fc9bc2c6724967b243903ac
|
| Nota n°52376 |
da jiuanszhii
il 10/09/2013 @ 17:52 | | ???????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????,??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,http://www.japanesefactorybrand.com/KOSS-2446/??????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ????????????????????????,AKG ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,??? ????????????????????????????????????????????,http://www.japanbrandoutleter.com/%E3%82%A2%E3%83%87%E3%82%A3%E3%83%80%E3%82%B9-4687/????????????,??? ??????? ?????????C????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,http://www.japanbrandoutleter.com/%E3%83%A9%E3%82%B 3%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86-4690/? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,bluetooth ?????? ?????????????????????????,http://www.japanbrandstorer.com/CASIO-2855/?????????????????????????????????????????????????????)??????????????????????????:
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
fb4a2d620fc9bc2c6724967b243903ac
|
| Nota n°52375 |
da siglulstsr
il 10/09/2013 @ 17:52 | | In a ,Coach ???????, Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee and the GOP?s 2012 vice presidential nominee,FALCHI, said ?the president should get credit for achieving record-breaking turnout numbers from urban areas for the most part, and that did win the election for him.? Ryan?s critics noted that President Barack Obama also fared well in states like Iowa,??? ?????, where the urban vote is relatively small. Some even suggested that Ryan?s remarks were a kind of racial code, in which ?urban areas? served as a stand-in for black and Latino voters. Yet Ryan?s observation speaks to a deeper truth that should trouble Republicans.Although rural regions dominate the map of the contiguous United States, an overwhelming majority of Americans live in urban and suburban areas. Democrats have long dominated dense urban cores. But Democrats increasingly dominate dense inner suburbs?as opposed to sprawling outer suburbs,?????, where Republicans still hold their own?as well,EMPORIOARMANI, and the share of the population concentrated in dense suburban counties is steadily increasing. This is true not only among Latino,Coach ????, black, and Asian voters living in these communities, but of white voters as well.Consider, for example, the political trajectory of Fairfax County in northern Virginia, a dense suburban county with a population of 1.1 million that lies just across the Potomac from Washington, D.C. As recently as 2000, the GOP presidential candidate George W. Bush won Fairfax with 48.9 percent of the vote to Al Gore?s 47.5 percent. In 2004, though, Bush lost Fairfax to John Kerry 45.9 percent to 53.3 percent. Barack Obama won Fairfax by an overwhelming 60.1 percent in 2008, and he won it again by an only slightly less overwhelming 59 percent in 2012. One of the most striking numbers from Fairfax is that George W. Bush?s winning vote total in 2000 — 202,181 — is an eerily close match for Mitt Romney?s losing total in 2012 — 206,VOLTAGE,733. It just so happens that Obama won 315,273 votes in 2012. And Fairfax is hardly alone. Orange County, California?once? a hotbed of Goldwaterite conservatism?backed Mitt Romney by 51.9 percent of the vote, a sharp decline from the 55.8 percent support George W. Bush received in 2000. You?ll find the same pattern in Wake County, North Carolina, DuPage County,SleeptrackerPROELITE, Illinois and Jefferson County, Colorado and other populous inner suburban counties across the country. In The Emerging Democratic Majority, John Judis and Ruy Teixeira referred to these communities as post-industrial ?ideopolises,? in which economic life revolves around college-educated professionals working in knowledge-intensive services and the less-skilled workers who meet their various needs.Rather than fixate on ethnicity, conservatives would do well to think more about urbanity. What is it about life in America?s densest, most productive, and most economically stratified metropolitan areas that persuades voters to back Democrats? When this phenomenon was limited to the populous coastal metropolitan areas, it could reasonably be explained away as a product of regional political polarization. But the leftward trend in urban areas is chipping away at the GOP?s advantage in the South and the Mountain West as well.Among conservatives, there is a broad post-election consensus that America?s demographic transformation represents a serious challenge for a Republican Party that is disproportionately backed by white Anglos and voters over the age of 65. Thus many on the right have called on congressional Republicans to embrace comprehensive immigration reform as part of a larger effort to woo Latino voters. The pushback has been that Latino voters tend to be less affluent and more likely to rely on anti-poverty programs such as SNAP and Medicaid, and so it is hardly surprising that they are more inclined to support Democrats. What is more striking,??? ???, however, is that Asian-American voters, a relatively affluent group, favored Obama by 73 percent to 26 percent. One possible explanation is that Asian-Americans are heavily concentrated in dense coastal regions, where they vote much like white Anglos with similar educational profiles and religious beliefs. That is,FREDERIC CASTET, secular college-educated Asian Americans appear to be about as hostile to the GOP as secular college-educated white Anglos, which is to say very much so.Related-articles:
LExpress Boutique Studio Ciné
Dans les coulisses du tournage de Nous York à Brooklyn - Studio Ciné Live
abf9cf2b6db1f68d8e4a1bade742f4bb
|
| Nota n°52374 |
da kcsndnupkr
il 10/09/2013 @ 17:52 | | Allow me to be among the first working journalists to welcome Chelsea Clinton to the Fourth Estate. Clinton, as you probably read in this morning’s?,EMPORIOARMANI, has taken a job with NBC News as a full-time special correspondent and will cover stories for the network’s do-gooder “” series.Please read no snark into my Clinton welcome.Yes, I know that many of you will deplore the fact that somebody like Clinton with no real journalistic experience but plenty of connections has won a high-ranking reporting position at a broadcast network. Your thought balloons about cronyism,?????????????????????, already passing over my office,KANSAI YAMAMOTO, read, If Chelsea wanted to be a journalist she should have gone to journalism school or gotten an internship and parlayed that into a job covering crime for a paper in the boonies, and then over the years worked her way up.But Clinton, who will turn 32 in February,???, isn’t the first high-profile political spawn to use the family name as a media-career springboard. The Times article notes that President George W,Panasonic. Bush daughter,MICHELJURDAIN? is an NBC Today correspondent,AVIREX, and presidential candidate Sen. John McCain’s daughter Meghan McCain contributes to MSNBC. Caroline Kennedy has published nearly a dozen? about patriotism, the Bill of Rights, courage, and poetry and Susan Ford, daughter of President Gerald Ford, has published two volumes of?. Ron Reagan,IZAX VALENTINO, Michael Reagan, and Maureen Reagan all leveraged their father’s prominence into jobs behind the microphone. Maria Shriver,R KIKUCHI, whose uncle was President John Kennedy and whose father, Sargent Shriver,LANCASTER, ran for vice president, capitalized on her family connections to get a? as a reporter at a Philadelphia TV station in 1977 straight out of college at the age of 22. She moved to CBS News six years later. You know the rest.Related-articles:
VIDEO DU JOUR. Le début du documentaire sur Carin
American Tower extends network reach with American Tower extends network reach with $3.3 billion d.3 billion d
Coiffure de mariée - LEXPRESS
abf9cf2b6db1f68d8e4a1bade742f4bb
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Preferenze |
 505 membri
Utenti registrati online
( Nessuno )
|
|
|
GuppY
Insérer une page externe
visitatori online
© 2004-2012 
