Menu  |
|
|
|
| Telefoni |
Il nostro centralino:
+39 0924 507600 pbx
Il nostro fax:
+39 0924 507607
|
|
|
 |
Libro d'Onore |
 |
|
| Nota n°50442 |
da bezmohlicy
il 09/09/2013 @ 16:58
 http://www.ccochoutletpaonlinejapan.tk | | You have got to admire Steven Spielberg. He has taken the well-worn story of Abraham Lincoln?s final days and turned it into a pointed piece of contemporary political commentary. When he first met Doris Kearns Goodwin back in 1999, well before she had completed of the Lincoln White House, Team of Rivals, it seems Spielberg decided to film an episode in Lincoln?s life that would ring true at the time of release many years later. He chose to concentrate his ?Lincoln? movie on a pivotal time in the presidency: the final five months when Lincoln had just been re-elected,PUMA, when the Civil War was all-but won,Canon, and when the fractious House was undecided about whether to fall in with Lincoln?s stated aim of abolishing slavery.There is an obvious comparison to today?s politics, with President Barack Obama newly re-elected and facing a similarly hazardous short period to dragoon a recalcitrant and largely hostile House to do his bidding over taxes,?????? ???, entitlements and spending. Where Lincoln was working against the clock to ensure the Civil War would continue long enough to prevent Southern pro-slavers from returning to the Union Congress to wreck his plan to outlaw slavery,????, so Obama is teetering at the edge of a similarly perilous precipice. And just as Lincoln was surrounded in government by his old rivals,EDHARDY, so Obama has as loyal lieutenants his former challengers for the Democratic candidacy, Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton.As Spielberg?s movie shows, Lincoln rejected his close colleagues? assessment that the daunting arithmetic of the divided House meant he would fail to force through his emancipation measure. Lincoln?s towering achievement is so well known to make a spoiler alert unnecessary. Through guile, arm-twisting, argument,GSX, bribery, and bullying, the president pressed on and,????? ??, while he kept members of a Southern peace delegation kicking their heels,BURBERRY, the requisite votes were found to convert his of 1863 into law. Whether Obama can pull off a similar coup and save America from a ruinous combination of high taxes and deep public spending cuts remains to be seen.Spielberg?s Lincoln is also an eloquent reminder that not long ago Republicans were the defenders of civil rights for all. The Party of Lincoln has long since turned its back on such noble thoughts and become a redoubt of grouchy old men bemoaning the fact that America, a nation of immigrants, has become a multicultural haven. What would Lincoln have made of the skulduggery and dissembling that led Republicans in so many states to hastily pass laws ostensibly to ward off voter fraud that are in fact shameless attempts to hinder the poor, the young, the old and those in racial minorities from using the ballot box? That pained groaning you hear is Honest Abe spinning in in Springfield, Illinois.The screenwriter of Lincoln,??? ?????, Tony Kushner, mainly keeps to historical fact, though in the opening scene he imagines a conversation between the president and two black soldiers that forges the link between the slice of history we are about to witness and the events we are living through. While one infantryman nods in deference,?????? ?? ???, the other urges the president to do the right thing, to fulfill his destiny and give blacks freedom and the vote. With the war almost won, the young man argues, it is no time to backslide. The young soldier looks forward to an election where former slaves stand in line to vote and eventually take their rightful place in Congress.Related-articles:
???????? - ????(????)
ANALYSE-Ob Fernseher oder Han
?????????1960?????? ?????????
28235d52a7bca2b9c0921ac06434f788
|
| Nota n°50441 |
da qyqwvsakkv
il 09/09/2013 @ 16:58 | | ,TECHNOS¡¡±ø?ì±h¤ÎÕæ¤óÖФ«¤é¤ä¤ä?¤ËλÖ乤ëÎ÷ÃÊС£¤½¤³¤Ë¤Ï×ÔÈ»¤ÊïLºÏ¤¤¤ÈØN¤«¤ÊÉ«²Ê¡¢¤½¤·¤Æ¤ä¤µ¤·¤¤¼¡´¥¤ê¤Î¿?Î郎¤¢¤ê¤Þ¤¹¡£¸ß¤¤¼¼Ðg¤ò³Ö¤ÄÂ?Èˤ¿¤Á¤¬×ÔÈ» ¤È¤È¤â¤ËÓý¤ó¤Ç¤¤¿ÖéÓñ¤Î¥Æ¥¥¹¥¿¥¤¥ë¡¢¤½¤ì¤¬¡¸²¥ÖÝ¿?¡¹¤Ç¤¹¡£ ¡¡²¥ÖÝ¿?¤Ï¡¢½ñ¤«¤é¼s£²£²£°Äê¤â¤ÎÎô¡¢?m´ó¹¤¤¬¾©¶¼¤ÎÎ÷ê?¤«¤é³Ö¤Á?¢¤Ã¤¿¿?Îï¤Î¼¼Ðg¤ò»ù¤ËÕQÉú¤·¤¿¤È¤¤¤ï¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤½¤Î׿Խ¤·¤¿Â?È˼¼Ðg¤«¤é¿?¤ê¤Ê¤¹¥¯¥ª¥ê¥Æ ¥£¤Î¸ß¤µ¤«¤é¡¢¥ë¥¤¥ô¥£¥È¥ó¤ä¥Ð©`¥Ð¥ê©`¡¢¥À¥Ã¥¯¥¹¤Ê¤É¡¢º£Íâ¥Ö¥é¥ó¥É¤«¤é¤â?ñÓ䵤ì¤ë¤Ê¤É¡¢ÊÀ½ç¤Î¥Õ¥¡¥Ã¥·¥ç¥ó¥·©`¥ó¤Ç¤âÃû¤òñY¤»¤Æ¤¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£ ¡¡¾©¶¼¤«¤é³Ö¤Á?¢¤¨¤é¤ì¤¿¤È¤¤¤ï¤ì¤ë¼¼Ðg¤Ï¡¢Î÷äÎØN¤«¤Ê×ÔÈ»¤¬ÐΤˤ·¤Þ¤·¤¿¡£¼Ó¹Å´¨¡¢É¼Ô´¨¡¢Ò°ég´¨¤ÎÈý±¾¤ÎØN¤«¤ÊºÓ¤ÎÁ÷¤ì¤È¡¢È¾É«¤Ë×î¤âßm¤·¤¿¡¸Ü?Ë®¡¹¤¬ÃÀ¤ ·¤¤È¾É«¤Ø¤È?§¤¡¢×ÔÈ»¤È¤Î¹²Éú¤¬¤³¤Î²¥ÖÝ¿?¤òÓý¤ó¤Ç¤¤¤ë¤Î¤Ç¤¹¡£ ¡¡Î÷äο?Îï¤ÎÌØ?դϡ¸ÏÈȾ¡¹¤Ç¤¹¡,Kentex?/p> ¡¡¤½¤ÎÃû¤Îͨ¤ê¡¢ÏȤËôé¤òȾ¤á¡¢È¾¤áÉϤ¬¤Ã¤¿ôé¤Ç±ú¤ò¿?¤êÉϤ²¤Æ¤¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¤½¤Î¤¿¤á¡¢³öÀ´ÉϤ¬¤ë¿?Îï¤Ï×ÔÈ»¤ÊïLºÏ¤¤¤È¤Ê¤ê¡¢°kÉ«¤¬Á¼¤¯ØN¤«¤ÊÉ«²Ê¤Ï¡¢Ëû¤Î¿?Îï¤Ç ¤Ï±í¬F¤Ç¤¤Ê¤¤ÊËÉϤ¬¤ê¤Î¸ß¤µ¤Ç¤¹¡£ ¡¡¤³¤Î²¥ÖÝ¿?¤Î?sÊ·¤òÖؤ󤸤ʤ¬¤é¡¢Ð¤·¤¤¥¹¥¿¥¤¥ë¡¢È¡¤ê½M¤ß¤ò¥«¥¿¥Á¤Ë¤·¤Æ¤¤¤¯¡¸hatsutoki¡¹¡£ Related-articles:
Türkei erwartet wegen Syrien
2012 August Lawrence Summer
Società Quotate it.reuters.c
28235d52a7bca2b9c0921ac06434f788
|
| Nota n°50440 |
da qyqwvsakkv
il 09/09/2013 @ 16:57 | | Should a law firm’s client suffer the consequences of a misstep by his lawyers?That seems to be the fate of David Parse, a former Deutsche Bank accountant who was convicted of mail fraud and obstructing an investigation in 2011,LUMINOX, as part of what’s been called the government’s biggest-ever tax fraud prosecution. Last week, U.S. District Judge?William Pauley,EPSON?of Manhattan once again?, even though the judge previously??of three of Parse’s co-defendants (including two former Jenkens & Gilchrist partners), after evidence surfaced that a juror lied during jury selection. Pauley’s latest ruling,POLICE, which marks the second time the judge has refused to order a new trial for Parse, concludes that Parse’s former lawyers at?Brune & Richard?were not ineffective counsel, even though they made what turned out to be a disastrous decision not to inform the court of suspicions about the lying juror.I’ve previously written about Brune & Richards’?, but to recap quickly: During jury selection, the firm ran across evidence that suggested a juror in the Parse case had the same name as a New York lawyer suspended from practice for alcohol abuse. Because of inconsistencies in the juror’s responses in voir dire, Brune & Richard concluded that the names were a coincidence and said nothing to the court before the trial — or during jury deliberations, when the juror used legal jargon in a note to the judge and the firm’s suspicions were reawakened.After the trial ended and the juror sent a gushing note to prosecutors,MARC BY MARC JACOBS, Brune & Richard rechecked records and found out that the juror had the same telephone number as the suspended lawyer. The firm then moved for a new trial for Parse without telling the judge that it had previously researched a possible connection between the juror and the suspended lawyer. That was a fateful mistake. Pauley subsequently determined that the juror was indeed the suspended lawyer and she’d lied to get on the jury. That misconduct,??????, he said,???????????? ???? ???`??, necessitated a new trial for Parse’s co-defendants.But not for Parse, Pauley said in a??last June. Even though three Brune & Richard lawyers testified at an evidentiary hearing in February 2012 that (among other things) the firm hadn’t even researched juror misconduct until a month after the verdict,SKAGEN, when prosecutors disclosed the letter they had received from the problem juror,moncler, Pauley implied that Parse’s lawyers decided as a matter of strategy not to reveal suspicions about the juror until after the end of the trial. That way, the judge suggested,HEADLOCK, Brune & Richard could move to vacate the conviction on the grounds of juror misconduct. At the very least, Pauley said in the June ruling,????? ????????, Brune & Richard should have done more digging early on, in order to make an informed decision about the problem juror. The firm’s failure to do so, he said, constituted a waiver of Parse’s right to a new trial.Related-articles:
Breakingviews Apples next act
?????????????????????????????
Air Products and Chemicals Inc (APD) Company Prof
28235d52a7bca2b9c0921ac06434f788
|
| Nota n°50439 |
da bezmohlicy
il 09/09/2013 @ 16:57 | | (Actualiza con precios de cierre, detalles) Por Wanfeng Zhou NUEVA YORK, 6 sep (Reuters) - El dólar cayó el viernesfrente a las grandes divisas, después de que un reporte clavesobre el empleo en Estados Unidos decepcionó a los inversoresque esperaban que la Reserva Federal comenzara a reducir suprograma de estímulo monetario este mes. * El dólar cayó un 1 por ciento frente al yen y retrocediódesde un máximo de siete semanas ante el euro después de que losdatos de Estados Unidos mostraron que el crecimiento del empleoen agosto fue menor a lo previsto, al tiempo que las cifras delos meses previos fueron revisadas a la baja. * Las expectativas de que la Fed anunciaría una disminuciónde sus compras mensuales de bonos en la reunión de política del17 y 18 de septiembre habían hecho subir al dólar en las últimassesiones. Una reducción del estímulo impulsaría el rendimientode los bonos del Tesoro de Estados Unidos y aumentaría elatractivo de los activos denominados en dólares. * El índice dólar,KANSAI YAMAMOTO, que mide la fortaleza de la divisaestadounidense frente a una cesta de seis grandes monedas, cayóun 0,6 por ciento a 82,152,????, alejándose de su máximo de sietesemanas de 82,671 alcanzado el jueves. * La tasa de desempleo alcanzó un mínimo de cuatro a?os ymedio en un 7,3 por ciento,???? ??, debido a que los estadounidensesdejaron de buscar trabajo. * El euro subió un 0,4 por ciento a 1,3176 dólares,MONTRES,recuperándose de un mínimo de sesión de 1,BROOKIANA,3103 dólares,Nikon, segúndatos de Reuters,ADRIANO, su menor nivel desde el 19 de julio. * Frente al yen, el dólar perdió un 1,VESTAL,1 por ciento a 99,06yenes,FERRARI, luego de tocar un máximo de seis semanas de 100,Coach ??????,22yenes. Related-articles:
UPDATE 3-Colombia coal strike now in hands of labor ministry Reuters
The sober way to legalize mar
Yes, there is a better way to run a railroad Nicholas Wapshott
28235d52a7bca2b9c0921ac06434f788
|
| Nota n°50438 |
da bezmohlicy
il 09/09/2013 @ 16:56
http://www.mnclerjackertonlinejapan.tk | | ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????,COGU?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????1??2?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,LUHW?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,VAGARY? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,Coach ??? ???????????????????????,HEBMILANO? ???????????????????????????,TIMEX??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,VICEROY? ???????????????????,SEAHOPE??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Related-articles:
??????????????10?????????????
2012 May Bethany McLean
2011 January Hugo Dixon
28235d52a7bca2b9c0921ac06434f788
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Preferenze |
 507 membri
Utenti registrati online
( Nessuno )
|
|
|
GuppY
Insérer une page externe
visitatori online
© 2004-2012 
