Menu  |
|
|
|
| Telefoni |
Il nostro centralino:
+39 0924 507600 pbx
Il nostro fax:
+39 0924 507607
|
|
|
 |
Libro d'Onore |
 |
|
| Nota n°45401 |
da ddgsegpx32
il 07/09/2013 @ 03:48 | | When my oldest son was eight, we decided to get a dog. I've raised dogs before so I had a fairly good idea of what I was getting myself into, until I realized our new dog was the devil's spawn in furry disguise. I won't get into all the trouble he caused. We made a difficult decision to send him back to his previous owner, but my son was adamantly against it. He went on a hunger strike and refused to speak to anyone, including at school (he inherits the drama queen gene from both his parents). So one day we sent him to his grandparents under the guise of a happy weekend outing,???, and secretly took the dog back. After our son came home we lied and said the dog died. To make it believable we pretended to have buried the dog in the backyard. My son is now 13 and he still goes to the "grave" to mark every anniversary of the "death," which in itself is impressive because he doesn't even remember his own birthday. Anyway, the problem is, we are now moving home. My son has been increasingly worried about leaving Scooter behind and has been asking us to exhume his body to re-bury him in our new house. He is insisting that he be there to witness the "ceremony" of exhuming and reburying as he feels he never got a proper chance to say goodbye at the original "funeral." Knowing our son, he would be devastated and perhaps scarred for life if we admit the truth. I know it was wrong to lie but we don't want our son to lose trust in us forever because of what happened in the past. What should we do? |
| Nota n°45400 |
da 18vlwewsa
il 07/09/2013 @ 03:48
 http://www.kabansstorejpan.com/ | | victory before 17,372 at Red Bull Arena.“I should bury it,” said De Rosario, whose 103 regular season goals are sixth on the league charts.The Red Bulls (12-9-6) also claimed the Atlantic Cup, presented to the winner of the season series, for the third time in four years.United (3-18-5) is 1-7-2 in the past 10 outings and 0-10-3 with only four goals scored on the road.“It’s the way it’s been going all year,” midfielder said.United trailed after eight minutes, tied it on ’s goal late in the 36th, then conceded Tim Cahill’s go-ahead header two minutes later.United generated several quality chances in the second half but hit the crossbar, missed a penalty kick and couldn’t take advantage of a shorthanded opponent in the last 20 minutes.“The character we showed . . . I am proud of the performance,” United Coach Ben Olsen said. “I keep saying it: I like this team. I like the future for D.C. United. I am not blowing smoke.”The Red Bulls smoked United in the early stages. was fortunate not to surrender a penalty kick and receive a red card. His challenge on Cahill appeared to get more of the Australian forward than the ball, but referee Juan Guzman allowed play to continue.As the Red Bulls howled for a penalty, Lloyd Sam chipped an acutely angled shot with perfect arc and weight. The ball floated over goalkeeper , struck the back post and crossed the goal line ever so briefly before Hamid could slap it clear.Nine minutes after missed a gaping net, DeLeon scored his first of the year. De Rosario crossed to the far side of the penalty area. DeLeon chested it down and, with a nasty cutback,???????, sent defender David Carney tumbling. He then slotted a six-yarder past the advancing Robles.The joy was short-lived. Unchallenged on the wing, Jonny Steele crossed to Cahill, who beat for an eight-yard header beyond Hamid’s reach for his team-leading eighth goal.United set the terms after halftime. ’s header hit the crossbar, and Neal’s blast tested Robles. In the 72nd minute, De Rosario snuck around Ibrahim Sekagya, who was shielding the ball in the box as Robles approached. As De Rosario poked at it, Sekagya brought him down.Robles, though, foiled the penalty kick. Last fall, he thwarted ’s attempt in the first leg of a playoff series that United ended up winning.“Even without the PK, we could have maybe gone on and won it,” Neal said. “We played some pretty decent stuff. At the end of the day, though, we still lost.”United notes: Pontius (hamstring) missed his seventh consecutive match. The club is taking a cautious approach in hopes he will be ready for the U.S. Open Cup final Oct. 1. . . . De Rosario, Jakovic and will report to Canadian national team training camp in Spain and prepare for a Sept. 8 friendly against Mauritania. They will miss the Chivas USA away match next weekend.??SPORTING KANSAS CITY 2, RAPIDS 1: Graham Zusi scored in the 88th minute to lift Kansas City to a home victory over Colorado and into a three-way tie for first place in the Eastern Conference.Benny Feilhaber also scored for Kansas City (12-9-6), which broke a two-match scoreless and losing streak and pulled even with Montreal and New York atop the East.??IMPACT 0, UNION 0: Troy Perkins made four saves to help Montreal play to a scoreless draw on the road against Philadelphia.??SOUNDERS 1, CREW 0: Eddie Johnson scored in the 14th minute to lift Seattle to a win over Columbus on the road despite playing down a man for 83 minutes. Johnson gave Seattle (12-8-4) the lead on a header off a 35-yard free kick by Mauro Rosales for his seventh goal. |
| Nota n°45399 |
da xrnkucubmp
il 07/09/2013 @ 03:47 | | té de la pas moins célèbre "Chambre" du même artiste. Le Grand Atelier du Midi. ses deux adjoints et huit conseillers avaient démissionné en mars dernier pour contester l'inclusion,???? ??, soit "une somme énorme" pour un village au budget d'environ 300 000 euros sans cette manne,??????, j'ai eu tellement de mal à arriver en France,Coach ??????,tre Marigny jusqu'au 1er juillet. puis ados sur les tables,?????? ???????, vous effacez le tout et repartez pour un nouveau lot d?émotions à partager. une fonction très claire? Florentino Pérez a décidé de sortir la carte Zizou de sa manche pour faire accepter son choix. Cindy Gallop s'était alors rendu compte de leur tendance à vouloir reproduire exactement les scénarios de films pornographiques. comme le rapporte . notably the marketers that develop targeted advertisements based on your Internet activity. But analysts said the results were better than forecast. selon? mais un jeune homme sans emploi habitant la banlieue de Ch? surtout à la télévision. J?ai utilisé un terme d?argot qui n?est pas approprié en privé ou en public et le langage que j?ai utilisé ne doit pas être utilisé en public,?????? ??, Stevie Wonder etc..ne TV! Jury partial?le 11 octobre 2012 est peu ou prou identique à celui signé par Nicolas Sarkozy et Angela Merkel."SA REALISATION Le traité budgétaire européen?",??? ???,cher la fête. J'accuse! l'Union des étudiants juifs de France (UEJF), noter que les?et?ce à une invention révolutionnaire. "C'est particulièrement adapté pour les pays en développement,?????,L'application crashe au lancement et affiche un message m'informant que j'ai découvert un bug Attention, . etc. peut le plus. Les modèles actuels étant plus orientés vers un usage consultatif (Internet,???? ?????, de telle sorte que METRO n?a aucune obligation d?insérer un quelconque contenu et pourra notamment refuser d?insérer votre contenu Contributif si celui-ci ne respecte pas les présentes conditions générales, Vous êtes informé du droit qui Vous est reconnu d?obtenir la communication et,????? ?????,t psychopathe. cascadeur amoureux de la femme d'un truand, Une situation inacceptable pour la SNCF, qui a décidé de porter plainte.Une peine de coeur le jeune homme de 22 ans aurait été aperu par un contrleur alors qu'il marchait le long des voies Il aurait rejoint la voie ferrée située sur la ligne Mantes-la-Jolie - Paris-Saint-Lazare Des équipes de la SNCF et des secours se sont alors lancés à sa recherche avant de le retrouver au bout de presque quarante-cinq minutes Aux secouristes et aux policiers il a expliqué qu?il voulait mettre fin à ses jours "Il a dit souffrir d?une peine de cur" a confié une source policière au quotidien"Ce n'est pas un dépt de plainte contre un suicidaire mais contre une atteinte à la circulation des trains précise-t-on à la SNCF Il était en train d'errer autour des voies On a évité qu'il puisse atteindre à ses jours" Pour justifier la plainte l'entreprise explique que la situation du jeune homme était engageante "non seulement pour sa sécurité mais également pour les 400000 personnes qui transitent sur la gare Saint-Lazare chaque jour" Selon le journal bicolore () ou à paillettes (),?????? ??????,ts.Related_articles:
au cours d'un voyage linguist
"C?est un travail difficile.
J'ai flippé Et j'ai eu raison
bae9324d968009a75744e2ff236f2255
|
| Nota n°45398 |
da ddgsegpx32
il 07/09/2013 @ 03:47
http://www.kabansstorejpan.com/ | | the odd idea of issuing a platinum coin to get around the federal debt limit, Congress once again will be forced to decide whether to raise the debt limit. When this issue last loomed in 2011, we at the question of whether the United States had ever defaulted before. (Answer: It is not entirely unprecedented. There are three instances when the United States could be seen to have defaulted on its obligations — in 1790, in 1933 and in 1971.)The debt limit covers both publicly-held debt and debts the United States owes to itself (bonds to Social Security and Medicare for future obligations) so no matter what happens, the debt limit will have to be raised, one way or the other.But for readers who have been wondering, here’s a history lesson on why the United States has a debt limit in the first place. Essentially, Congress was trying to make life easier for itself. It started with a war. In the early decades of the Republic, Congress preferred to issue debt for specific purposes, such as issuing bonds to build the Panama Canal. During the Spanish-American War of 1898, Congress authorized the Treasury secretary to issue short-term debt and some longer-term debt with specific limits on maturities. But World War I was a conflict with unknowable costs, making targeted legislation difficult. At first Congress established a $5 billion limit on new issues of bonds, along with the immediate issuance of $2 billion in one-year certificates of indebtedness, in the First Liberty Loan Act of 1917. But very quickly another law was needed — the Second Liberty Bond Act of 1917 — in which Congress set a general limit on borrowing: $9.5 billion in Treasury bonds and $4 billion in one-year certificates. This freed the Treasury secretary to begin to figure out the best mix of securities to issue, without nearly as much congressional oversight as before.By the end of World War I, the limit on Treasury obligations had been raised to $43 billion, which was considerably more than the $25 billion in outstanding public debt in 1919. For decades, future increases in the national debt were simply amendments to the Second Liberty Bond Act. But it was not in 1939 — on the eve of World War II — that Congress eliminated all of the different limits on types of bonds, thus creating an overall aggregate limit on the national debt.We learned much of this from an interesting , published in the Journal of Finance, by H.J. Cooke and M. Katzen, which was posted on the . The article notes that the debt limit generally was raised without controversy until a White House request to raise the limit in 1953 was sidetracked in the Senate, “where the ceiling was viewed as an instrument for forcing economy on the executive branch of the government.” Hmm, that sounds familiar. But in that case, it was a Republican president, Dwight D. Eisenhower, who faced a roadblock from a Democratic senator, Harry F. Byrd of Virginia, who then chaired the Senate Finance Committee. (UPDATE: Mea culpa, Byrd was a key Eisenhower antagonist on the debt ceiling--and he chaired the committee after 1954--but in 1953 Republicans still controlled the Senate and refused to raise the debt limit. As noted: “The Eisenhower administration had confronted a Republican Congress onan important component of the nation's financial management and lost. Moreover, it signaled the start of a pattern that made debt ceiling legislation a component of the broader efforts by fiscal conservatives to control government spending.”)Eisenhower wanted to build the national highway system,?????, which he considered an important investment in the future, but Byrd was concerned that national debt built up during World War II and the Great Depression was becoming a permanent feature of the U.S. government. Eisenhower that he had “moved promptly and vigorously” to cut spending but still needed the debt limit raised to pay outstanding bills.But Byrd was not satisfied, and he demanded more cuts in exchange for a debt-limit increase. For a while, Byrd held the upper hand, forcing Treasury to take emergency measures to avoid default, but eventually Eisenhower got the debt ceiling raised in 1954, though not as much as he had hoped. “An essential part of this preparedness [for national security] is a debt limit high enough to permit the Treasury, if necessary, to borrow the funds required to carry out the government’s obligations under the Constitution and under the laws of the Congress,” Eisenhower when he signed the bill establishing the new debt limit.In other words, there are no original ideas in politics. The debt limit was originally conceived as a way to make things easier for Congress, because lawmakers were tired of having to issue bonds for specific purposes. (Congress, after all, had already decided to spend the money.) But then Congress often finds a way to make the easy stuff hard |
| Nota n°45397 |
da 18vlwewsa
il 07/09/2013 @ 03:47 | | Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson.(Vince Bucci - Associated Press)When a celebrity marriage ends unexpectedly, as was the case with , the conversation often turns to Hollywood couples that cannot, under any circumstances, break up lest the world declare that love is dead.One couple that falls in this category is Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson.So it is with a glad heart that I direct your attention to this life-affirming video of Hanks and Wilson smooching on a Kiss Cam at a recent L.A. Kings hockey game. Some days it’s just nice to see two people who have been married for 20 plus years share affection in public,?? ???.Watch the moment below.[ BWE] |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Preferenze |
 505 membri
Utenti registrati online
( Nessuno )
|
|
|
GuppY
Insérer une page externe
visitatori
visitatori online
© 2004-2012 
