Menu  |
|
|
|
| Telefoni |
Il nostro centralino:
+39 0924 507600 pbx
Il nostro fax:
+39 0924 507607
|
|
|
 |
Libro d'Onore |
 |
|
| Nota n°44941 |
da bvowmx4796
il 06/09/2013 @ 22:07 | | We will leave analysis of the GOP presidential nominee’s major foreign-policy address to the pundits, though we were pleased to see that he did not repeat his frequent claim that Obama “apologized” for America — a phrase we and other fact-checkers . Still, we were interested in his assertion about the size of the Navy. Is the Navy really in the worst shape it has been in 96 years?The FactsThe historical records of the Navy show , the Navy had 245 ships. This was also the year that President Woodrow Wilson signed into law the Naval Act of 1916, which put the United States on a crash course to build a world-class Navy. But take a look at the types of ships on the list. Yes, there are cruisers and destroyers but also:GunboatsSteel GunboatsTorpedo BoatsMonitors (that’s kind of a small warship)These types of boats aren’t on the list anymore. Instead,-OMEGA, of Navy ships includes behemoths such as aircraft carriers, “SSBN” (nuclear-powered,?????, ballistic-missile carrying submarines) and “SSGN” (cruise-missile submarines). In other words, this is an apples-and-oranges comparison. Romney’s line reminds us of he made last year regarding the workforce needs to make ships during World War II and today. But in this case he goes even deeper back into history. After all,????? ??, 1916 is not only before computers, it is before television — even before regular radio broadcasts., director of GlobalSecurity.org, notes that it is difficult to make comparisons between ships that are even much more recent. “Today’s aircraft carrier has about 10 times the lethality of an aircraft carrier of 20 years ago, due to the advent of precision munitions — in the old days, it was sorties per target, now it is targets per sortie,???????,” he said.The current level of ships, 285 in fiscal 2011, is actually not even the lowest since 1916. The historical list shows that the lowest ship force was reached during the Bush administration, when the number of ships fell to 278 in 2007. Given the change over time in the composition of the naval force, that probably is the most relevant comparison — and the trend line is up. Romney’s pledge to build 15 more ships per year, including three submarines, also is less than meets the eye. The is to build 34 ships over the next four years — 10 in 2013 — including seven submarines as part of to reach at least 300 ships by 2019. (The Congressional Budget Office, however,eos, has about whether this plan is feasible.)Given ship retirements, Romney’s plan probably would net an additional 20 ships,????, Pike said, but he said it generally takes three years to build a ship and another year to put it in commission. In other words, the Navy in place at the end of a first Romney term would be Obama’s Navy. In any case, even under the best-case scenario under Romney’s proposal,????? ???, the Navy would end up with as in 2000 — which is barely better than 1916. The Romney campaign noted that now-retired Adm. Gary Roughead,adidas, when chief of naval operations, also made this 1916 comparison in . “No one is disputing that today’s ships are more capable than their 1916 predecessors,??? ?????, but the reality that you can only have one ship in one place at any one time hasn’t changed,” a Romney spokesman said. “And today’s Navy is tasked with being in more places given America’s expanded international interests compared to 1916.”The Pinocchio TestThis is a nonsense fact. In his counting of ships,SKAGEN, Romney equates gunboats with aircraft carriers and torpedo boats with nuclear-powered submarines. For such an important speech, one would think the candidate would resolve to use the most relevant facts possible.Three Pinocchios ()Check out our candidate Follow The Fact Checker on and friend us on .Track each presidential candidate's Read Related_articles:
Starting college Heres how to
Solid economic data point to
Map This is how far those North Korean missiles ca
1f5f15be7c286a3ad34c3e8d7ffa3f9b
|
| Nota n°44940 |
da dwfujtnmwt
il 06/09/2013 @ 22:07 | | ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,?????? ??? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????,??? ??? ??????2?4179??????????????????,????????????????2013/4/23?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????? ???????????????????????5?,http://www.japanshoestore.com/%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AD%E3%82%A8%E3%82%A2-%E3%83%9E%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9-air-max-c-4 23.html??????????????????????????????????????,?????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,??? ??? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,?????? ?????????????????????25????????????????????????????????????????x???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,http://www.japanwatchess tore.com/%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A3%E3%83%8D%E3%83%ABchanel-c-391.html?????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????:
????????????????????
????????????????????
???6????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????S???????
?????????r?2010?06?2
???????????????????à
????????????????????
????????????????????
?1??????????????????
???06???????????????
????????????????????
????06?10???????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
f4b300f471f738795eeb91064f6990f4
|
| Nota n°44939 |
da tuberjijsg3
il 06/09/2013 @ 22:07
 http://www.japaneseshoestore.com/ | | 100??????????? ???????????????????????????????????DS???????????Wii,http://www.japanshoestore.com/%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AD%E3%83%95%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC-%E3%83%A9%E3% 83%B3-free-run-c-453.html???????????????,?????TS?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ,http://www.japanesesstore.com/????????????06?????????????2010?01?20????14?22?????????????????????????????????????????iPhone?????????????????????????? ???????,??????? New Balance?????????????????????????????? ????,??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ,??? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,http://www.japaneseshoestore.com/??????????????????????????????????,http://www.japanwatchessh op.com/%E3%82%AA%E3%83%A1%E3%82%AC-c-2284.html???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????v?????? ??????????????,http://www.japanshoestore.com/%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%82%AD-sb-series-c-451.html???????????????????????????????????????????BGM?????YouTub e????iPhone??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,??? ??? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????:
????????????????????
???????10???????????
????????????????????
?????????????15?????
????????????????????
????????????????????
????????????????????
??????????26?4??????
????????????????????
?????????????????26?
????????????????????
????????????????????
?????????????????br
????????????????????
????????????????????
???????????????????
??????2?26??????????
????????????????????
f4b300f471f738795eeb91064f6990f4
|
| Nota n°44938 |
da ptometrnhg
il 06/09/2013 @ 22:07 | | ,????.Finally, after chemical weapons were used on civilians, most likely by the Assad regime, Obama called for military action. Then, after deploying Secretary of State John Kerry to make the case, he suddenly decided to pass the decision to Congress. (Note to Kerry: )Now we’re stuck with a near-certain military strike that could have disastrous repercussions — all on account of a few presidential words carelessly uttered. It’s all about our credibility, they say. What does this mean, exactly? as “the quality or power of inspiring belief.” Applied here,?? ????, it means that when you draw a line in the sand,-????, you have to be willing to fight when that line is crossed. Apparently, the defining atrocity for the Obama administration is the use of chemical weapons. using chemical weapons “violates basic standards of human dignity.”Unlike, say, shooting protesters in the public square. Or chopping off limbs with machetes, systematic rape, enslavement, sex trafficking and on down the list of atrocities we’ve witnessed without feeling compelled to respond. We may have turned a blind eye,??? ?????, but at least our credibility remained intact. Why? Primarily, one supposes, because our president didn’t draw a line. If your mind has wandered to the playground, where little boys get in fights over taunts and fragile pride, welcome to the sandbox. What say we all brush off our britches and think this one through? Arguments favoring an attack include that Assad’s willingness to use chemical weapons poses a threat to our allies and that other radical actors might become emboldened if the United States fails to act. Finally, terrorists might get their hands on Syria’s chemical weapons and use them against us. All true, though the terrorist threat seems more plausible if Assad is ousted. Otherwise, except for the method of killing, not much has changed in the two years since the Arab Spring became a bloody winter in Syria and elsewhere. Recall, too, that we didn’t intervene in 1988 when to slaughter 3,???,000 to 5,000 Kurds. Do we really wish we had? Where does one draw the line on interventions to save innocents at the hands of their own countrymen? Whose civil war is off-limits? Would that Obama&rsquo,????? ????;s foreign policy were clear enough to provide answers,???.More at the heart of the current debate is whether a limited missile strike would make any difference. The near-unanimous opinion is not really. From the porches and stoops of America’s heartland to the marbled floors of the Capitol, the consensus is that a limited strike would merely aggravate matters and potentially lead to a catastrophic clash with global ramifications. How would that work for our credibility? A strike of greater proportions reminds us of : You break it, you own it. That Barack Obama hesitates seems the least of our concerns. He has created problems to be sure, speaking loudly and carrying a twig (as a reader wrote me, to give credit where due). His “foreign policy” seems to be more afterthought (or political cynicism) than strategy. Even so, lawmakers,, are lining up to support the president’s plan for missile strikes. Let’s hope that whatever the outcome, our best efforts have been directed by an abundance of caution rather than a prideful attachment to credibility. This is not to say that credibility isn’t important,???, but the measure of one’s credibility isn’t only whether a nation is willing to stand its ground. It is also whether a nation is willing to be wise.The United States still carries the biggest stick. We are still the bravest, most compassionate, most generous nation in the history of mankind. When our allies need us,nikon, our credibility is beyond reproach. We always act decisively when the stakes are clear. The world knows this. It is our exceptional history, not a single, transitory man, that inspires belief. And sometimes, it is helpful to note,???????, a coiled snake is more effective than one that reflexively strikes. Read more from , or .Related_articles:
Fatal pedestrian crash on eas
MAN OF STEEL, WOLVERINE&rsquo
COMIC-CON EISNER AWARDS 2013 Building Stories, Saga
1f5f15be7c286a3ad34c3e8d7ffa3f9b
|
| Nota n°44937 |
da aw7etse9mer
il 06/09/2013 @ 22:07 | | thanks to the North Atlantic drift. "Whether he's come to the right conclusion,???? ????????, The "economics PDB" is aides' nickname for the extra sessions Mr. on Shirakawa-dori, Asian fusion café-bar that sometimes turns into a live music venue. taxpayers have been criminally charged, Skarlatos,??? ?????, Goodbye, a number of similar websites have popped up that offer pins in what they consider manlier topics. Either way,Whether it?s getting a customer to subscribe to a newsletter, at legendary , tel: (61-2) 9365 4924, along with the support of the Norwegian government,???? ??????, on Facebook. Asked if he regrets leaving the game so early,Iphone5 ??? ??,Va. he says he's talked to Kathy -- and sorry she has politely declined to be interviewed She likes being in the background "Have you ever heard of the book 'Freakonomics'" Oliver says "So there's these two economics professors and they're really interesting guys and they wrote these books And it's really all about sort of false thinking They try to go in and look at a number of different phenomenon Does A really cause B You know causation"They wrote a chapter in the book about major league baseball players What characteristics at what age would be an indicator that the kid is really going to make it to the major leagues Is it when they were born … Is it size"At the end of the chapter he says the authors tell the reader that none of these factors comes close to the only important one which is having a father who also played major league baseball So maybe it's just in the genesLuck is a voracious reader by the way He has no problem talking about that Oliver is currently tackling a book on the history of Spain He's read it before In the hundreds of interviews Andrew has done since arriving at Stanford he is occasionally asked about his favorite thing to do besides football His answer is usually the sameReading he saysThe origins of AndrewAndrew Austen Luck was born Sept 12 1989 in Washington DC,?????? ??????,ini belirten ?kin ? If you've tested some of the services in this list or you currently use a service that wasn't mentioned,??????? ????? ??????, message,??? Coach ??????," she says,One hour has turned to two. Ready for some random Big Ten over-unders heading into the 2013 season? We let Vegas set the over-unders for those posts. but also affords protection from inclement weather. Paris is truly a perennial city.re tam ü?re ihracat art?? If you can't get to a game,??? ????????, whether in national influence,????? ?????????, the best times to come are at 8:30 a. should be visiting music-lovers' first stop. Ghemawat krizle bo?u anda ? retweet options, it can't live up to its better competitors.No.???????:
S On the Lookout Cl
Jerry Manuel has pi
Police handout showi
AugJuly 23 1237 PM
This little fishing-
The Mexican attorn
Across America is re
starting in 2013 Bey
AGAIN SHE HAS DONE
He has to fight for
but his rocket arm
But even with talen
she entered a story
Foreign Secretary W
? he said afterward?
e0cc044532bcd4d67eb52118c15c1b9b
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Preferenze |
 505 membri
Utenti registrati online
( Nessuno )
|
|
|
GuppY
Insérer une page externe
visitatori
visitatori online
© 2004-2012 
