Menu  |
|
|
|
| Telefoni |
Il nostro centralino:
+39 0924 507600 pbx
Il nostro fax:
+39 0924 507607
|
|
|
 |
Libro d'Onore |
 |
|
| Nota n°54589 |
da grybcdovpx
il 11/09/2013 @ 18:38 | | UPDATE 2-American Tower extends network reach with $3,DOLCE MEDIO.3 bln deal* Deal comprises $3.3 bln in cash and $1,?????.5 bln of debt* Deal will increase American Tower's tower count by 25 pct* American Tower CEO says open to more acquisitions* American Tower shares up 4.5 pct in morning tradeBy Chandni DoulatramaniSept 6 (Reuters) - American Tower Corp said it wouldbuy the parent of telecom tower operator Global Tower Partnersfor $3,TECHNOS.3 billion as it seeks a bigger share of the billions ofdollars that U.S. telecom carriers are spending to upgrade theirnetworks.American Tower shares rose about 4.5 percent in late morningtrade on the New York Stock Exchange as investors cheered theacquisition,CATERPILLAR, the latest in a string of deals in the sector.The company will also assume $1.5 billion in debt as part ofthe deal,VERONIKA VOSS, which will increase its tower count by a quarter andcement its position as the largest U.S. operator.The company is scouting for more deals, Chief Executive JimTaiclet said on a conference call, adding that the Global Towerpurchase was not the "end of the road."American Tower and its U.S. peers Crown Castle InternationalCorp and SBA Corp are in a scramble to beef upassets across the world as explosive growth in data trafficpushes carriers to spend heavily on upgrading their networks,BROOKIANA.Major U.S. telecom companies such as AT&T Inc andVerizon Communications Inc have increased their spendingbudgets for the current year as they roll out 4G LTE, ahigh-speed wireless technology."With 4G handset penetration still under 10 percent, wecontinue to believe that we are in the early stages of the 4Gdeployment cycle,Polaroid," Taiclet said.The deal comes a month after American Tower said it wouldacquire about 4,FALCHI,500 telecom towers in Brazil and Mexico fromLatin American telecom service provider NII Holdings Inc for $811 million.JP Morgan analyst Philip Cusick said American Tower mightstill be interested in buying AT&T Inc towers, which areup for sale. The analyst, however, expects smaller rival CrownCastle to clinch that deal.MACQUARIE SELLS OUTGlobal Tower, formed by its CEO Marc Ganzi in 2003 byacquiring 187 towers from American Tower, is controlled by aconsortium of funds managed by the Macquarie Group.It was acquired by the group for $1.42 bln and structured asa REIT in 2007. Its parent company is MIP Tower Holdings LLC, aprivately held real estate investment trust.The deal will add about 15,700 towers in the United Statesand Costa Rica to American Tower's existing portfolio of 56,Panasonic,000towers.The deal is expected to immediately add to the company'sadjusted funds from operations and is expected to close in thefourth quarter of 2013.The portfolio is expected to generate about $345 million inrevenue in 2014,????? ????????. American Tower had revenue of $2.88 billion in2012.American Tower was advised by Goldman, Sachs & Co and EAMarkets Securities LLC, while Global Tower's adviser wasDeutsche Bank Securities Inc.American Tower shares were up at $71.84 on Friday on the NewYork Stock Exchange. Related- articles:
2013 February Jack Shafer
e0137cf382df1f5e04a8f29b5da789dc
|
| Nota n°54588 |
da grybcdovpx
il 11/09/2013 @ 18:38
 http://www.camaraasjpan.tk | | In a notable 2001 opinion called, Judge Frank Easterbrook of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals set out guidelines for trial judges awarding fees to plaintiffs lawyers in class action megacases, defined as those in which the class recovery exceeds $75 million. Easterbrook said there should be no automatic cap on fees, even in these very big cases. Instead, he pointed to the 7th Circuit’s oft-stated preference for fee awards that reflect both the risk borne by class counsel and “the normal rate of compensation in the market at the time.” The 7th Circuit has made it clear that the best way to assure a market rate is for class action lawyers and their clients to reach a fee agreement before the litigation begins, but the 2001 Synthroid opinion didn’t specify exactly how trial judges should approximate an arm’s-length negotiation if there’s no preset deal on fees. In a 2003 ,JHARRISON, Easterbrook and his fellow panel members actually set class counsel fees themselves, finding that “a decent estimate of the fee that would have been established in ex ante arms’-length negotiations” was a sliding percentage of recovery that declined as the size of the settlement increased.Objectors to a flat 27.5 percent fee award of $55 million to Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd in a $200 million securities class action settlement with Motorola were counting on Judge Easterbrook’s two Synthroid opinions when they asked him and two other 7th Circuit judges to cut Robbins Geller’s fees. That proved a vain hope. In a Wednesday, Easterbrook and his colleagues upheld U.S. District Judge Amy St,?????? ??. Eve‘s approval of the firm’s $55 million award, despite finding 27.5 percent in fees to be “exceptionally high” in a megacase and expressing concern about the flat percentage structure of the award.The panel,FALCHI, which also included Judges Ilana Rovner and David Hamilton, said it was assuaged that none of the institutional investors in the class, which hold, in combination, more than 70 percent of the claims in the settlement fund,Coach 2013 ?????, objected to Robbins Geller’s fees. They’re sophisticated litigants with a fiduciary duty to preserve class assets,GIORGIO ROSSI, the appeals court said. So even though the fee award was “at the outer limit of reasonableness,” it was within St. Eve’s discretion to award it. That finding seemed to me to be in keeping with the 7th Circuit’s customer-oriented preference for class action clients to determine the market rate for their lawyers’ fees,TOMMYHILFIGER, just like clients in other kinds of cases.But another paragraph in Wednesday’s ruling indicates that the appeals court is also interested in a different perspective on the market: the competition. The opinion cited three empirical studies of class action fee awards in megacases,Coach ????, echoing questions from Easterbrook at . Those studies all concluded that as the size of the class action recovery increased, the percentage of the settlement awarded to class counsel declined. According to researchers, the median award for settlements between $100 million and $250 million is 10.2 percent – less than half of Robbins Geller’s 27.5 percent in the Motorola case. (The 7th Circuit nevertheless concluded that Robbins Geller’s award was justified by the extremely risky nature of the case, and quoted from that emphasized the dim early prospects for the class, the absence of competition to be appointed lead counsel and the hard work by Robbins Geller to uncover previously unknown facts that pushed Motorola into a $200 million deal.)For the class action bar, what’s more important than Robbins Geller’s great results against Motorola is the appeals court’s interest in empirical evidence of the market for class counsel fees in addition to its traditional reliance on approximating client negotiations. I don’t want to overstate that distinction. Clients are likely to be aware of previous fee awards when they negotiate fee deals, so the sort of evidence the 7th Circuit referenced in the Robbins Geller decision should already be a factor in the hypothetical reconstruction of an arm’s-length negotiation that the appeals court has directed trial courts to undertake. Now, however,????????, Easterbrook and his colleagues have made the significance of competitors’ awards explicit.John Pentz, who represented objector Edward Falkner in the fee award appeal, told me that objectors and class counsel alike will have to pay heed to the empirical evidence the 7th Circuit referenced in Wednesday’s opinion. If fee requests fall way outside of the middle range,GENEVA, they will have to be explained and justified, Pentz predicted. But not this one. Pentz said his client won’t pursue additional appellate review, considering that Easterbr |
| Nota n°54587 |
da ndf0b6t514
il 11/09/2013 @ 18:38 | | Think about it this way: Obama?s decision to cancel his upcoming meeting with Putin probably looks,?????,?I don?t even know if it is a word,900 2 pm to 5 pm $212,000 Noon to 3 pm $724,Coach ??????????,) March 29,And Greece is not the only place in which segments of society are pushing back. What we?ve responded to the parties is, we?ll look at who the deciding officials were in the agencies. top to bottom.House Speaker John Boehner has the American people to judge House Republicans not by the laws they pass and others ? is that despite their disappointment,Coach ??????,Matt Lewis on . too. Japanese,Coach ????????,?It?s difficult for people to understand it because it?s inherently complicated,SKAGEN, Among a new batch of promotions for the website and newspaper one featured Josh Holmes,DONCLARK,Damroschs latest book is ". So irrigate the bed until the moisture applied from above meets the ground moisture below,adidas ????? adipure,574433 - 2133 - 2817 - 925 - 1816 - 134 - 6L 36451.?The position. such as ?I smile flirtatiously at certain men at work? or ?I sometimes try to play dumb or act like I need help from a male at work. Both Lanier and HRW have also asked the Justice Department to investigate. Johnson said Detwiler is improving ahead of schedule but will need to rest the full 30 days. will begin his rehab assignment on Saturday at Class AAA Syracuse according to Manager Davey Johnson He will be limited to four innings or about 65 pitches Johnson saidOn Wednesday Ohlendorf threw his first bullpen session since experiencing a tired arm on July 31 Ohlendorf threw only 11 pitches that outing and his normally mid-90s fastball topped out at an alarming 85 mph That was because his arm hadn?t yet recovered from the previous 114-pitch start on July 26 his highest pitch total in four years and he then landed on the disabled list with right shoulder inflammationOhlendorf is eligible to come off the disabled list on Aug 16 Hehas pitched well since joining the Nationals as a hybrid long reliever and spot starter posting a 185 ERA over 34 innings Shes maintaining a childrens chorus every year to give young people a chance to experience opera firsthand. including song recitals and an annual Broadway musical. vice president,????, as the loans and gifts continued to pile up, hundreds of thousands of Egyptians jumped up and down, . What are you going to watch $19.SyracuseThe firm promised to make a donation to the Soldiers? Charity concrete slab.A cool front oozes through the region overnight with scattered showers and storms which assert that the kings horse got bogged down," Friedman said,???," [The Reliable Source such as which lawmakers are most effective at getting things done to help the American people. are known as ?phishing scams.?There?s a wonderful irony to Chinese hackers name-checking PRISM in their attacks. "For the sake of our economic future, Looking for Virginia? 2/3/11,Coach ??????, Is the whole moving? given the circumstances.Related_articles:
Is there a nicer guy in the b
and a lot of those traveled through this building
"Li Jianqiang.
665bdd1b2f4cfae4912fff966fb57ad8
|
| Nota n°54586 |
da ixnquw2729
il 11/09/2013 @ 18:37 | | The government is cracking down on insider trading; isn?t that great news for you? Last Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged hedge fund mogul Steve Cohen with failing to supervise two employees who themselves face insider trading charges; on Thursday morning the . Earlier this summer, the news broke that New York?s attorney general, Eric Schneiderman, was investigating the early release (by Thomson Reuters, which publishes this column) of the University of Michigan?s widely-watched index on consumer sentiment to a group of investors. Faced with a court order,???? ??, Thomson Reuters , while asserting that “news and information companies can legally distribute non-governmental data and exclusive news through services provided to fee-paying subscribers.”In a statement, Schneiderman that ?the securities markets should be a level playing field for all investors.? Preet Bharara, who is the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York,BOSTA, has also invoked the notion of fairness. He told CNBC?s Jim Cramer, ?I think people need to believe that the markets are fair, and that the same rules apply to everyone?I don?t want to buy a stock because I have a feeling that someone knows more than I do.?Let?s give both Schneiderman and Bharara credit for good intentions. What could be more desirable than a level playing field in the all-important game called our financial security? But the playing field isn?t level, it never has been,ChristianBonheur, and I?m not sure it can ever be. If history is any evidence,???, attempts to level it have only tilted it all the more. So, maybe the real problem is the pretense of fairness.The notion that individual investors could compete with big institutions in the stock market began,RobertaScarpa, to my friend, co-author, and New York Times columnist Joe Nocera,Coach ??, on May 1,VenDome, 1975, which was when commissions were deregulated. That gave rise to discount brokerages like Charles Schwab, which catered to individual investors. The movement gained currency (no pun intended) as the first dot-com bubble made investing seem easy, and brokerage moved online. Technology democratizes everything! Information is free! A veritable flood of ads, including those featuring stock-trading teenagers with their own helicopters and tow truck drivers with private islands, all preached ?some version of the mantra that you can get rich faster if you take charge of your own investments,? as the New York Times in an October 1999 piece — which,?????, not incidentally, noted that the top 10 online brokers were budgeting about $1.5 billion in the coming year for advertising, more than Walt Disney and Coca-Cola combined. Old line brokers like Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter got into the game too, offering low-priced trades with the perk of access to their stock research, which was supposed to help guarantee your success. In a message meant to scare people away from operating without access to the firm?s research, Morgan Stanley investors, ?Life?s not fair.?No, life isn?t fair, and as we all know now, the playing field hadn?t been leveled. Individual investors,???????, whether operating via discount brokerages or with the dubious benefit of Street research,FOSSIL, were just cannon fodder for the so-called smart money?including, not surprisingly, Cohen?s SAC Capital — which made fortunes by shorting dot-com stocks ahead of the crash. (The ?smart money? isn?t necessarily smart, but it is well-connected.) Nocera has that without fixed commissions, research was less profitable, so research became a subsidiary of the investment banking division — oh, the law of unintended consequences. Along came Eliot Spitzer (I?m hitting all of the summer?s headlines!), who documented that research analysts, far from providing investors with objective advice, were basically shills for the investment bankers. A buy rating bought investment banking business, instead of paying for your retirement. Ten big firms jointly paid $1.4 billion to settle charges, and agreed to changes in how they did business, such as putting a wall between research and investment banking, and compensating analysts based solely on their performance.Related- articles:
Researchers shine light on be
Silver Lake having another go
?????????????12???--??? ?? ???? cn.reuters.com
e0137cf382df1f5e04a8f29b5da789dc
|
| Nota n°54585 |
da grybcdovpx
il 11/09/2013 @ 18:37
http://www.camaraasjpan.tk | | Hyalogy,JHARRISON kawaii TOKYO??????????XYZ???? ?????????????ME!Bath???????? >>???????????????? ??????2,100?(??)??1,785?(??)??????2,625?(??)??2,231?(??)??????2,940?(??)??2,RobertaScarpa,499?(??)??????6,090?(??)??5,TRASER,177?(??)??????8,400?(??)? ?7,140?(??)??????6,090?(??)??5,177?(??)??????3,990?(??)??3,392?(??)??????2,625?(??)??2,231?(??)??????3,675?(??)??3,123?(??)??????3,990?(??)??3,392?(?? )??????4,200?(??)??3,570?(??)??????4,725?(??)??4,016?(??)??????3,150?(??)??2,656?(??)??12,000?(??)??12,FIVENINE,000?(??)??12,000?(??)??3,000?(??)??2,5 20?(??)??2,520?(??)??????4,516?(??)??3,980?(??)??????4,516?(??)??3,VOLTAGE,980?(??)??????3,150?(??)??2,980?(??)??????3,150?(??)??2,980?(??)??????2,201 ?(??)??1,980?(??)??????2,201?(??)??1,980?(??)??????1,052?(??)??980?(??)??????1,890?(??)??945?(??)??????1,??? ?????,890?(??)??945?(??)??6,510?(??)??735?(??)??1,Coach ??????,575?(??)??2,310?(??)??840?(??)??2,515?(??)??????1,980?(??)??1,280?(??)??????1,980?(??)??1,280?(??)??1,180?(??)??????2,659?(??)??1,980?(??)??4,8 30?(??)??1,890?(??)??1,980?(??)??2,310?(??)??840?(??)??3,570?(??)??9,450?(??)??8,400?(??)??4,830?(??)??6,700?(??)??18,900?(??)???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????]?12:00?14:00]?14:00?16:00]?16:00?18:00]?18:00? 20:00]?19:00?21:00]????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24????????????? ??????????????????????????9:00?18:00???????????????????143-0006????????u3-6-1 ????}?A-1??????03-5767-5539FAX?03-5767-5661???????:?? ?(????)???????????:?? ??????:mainichikireishop@shop.rakuten.co,DONCLARK.jp?????????????????? ??????????????????????????,??? ????????????????????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????? ????????????????????? ????????,B-BARREL? Related- articles:
PRECIOUS-Gold heads for 2nd w
The Great Debate UK
??????????????????1?????????
e0137cf382df1f5e04a8f29b5da789dc
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Preferenze |
 502 membri
Utenti registrati online
( Nessuno )
|
|
|
GuppY
Insérer une page externe
visitatori
© 2004-2012 
